Hi:

Several years ago, Bill Clinton held a science colloquium at the White House in Washington DC and invited Stephen Hawking. After making his comments, which were well received, Stephen made a comment about Biology and was mildly rebuffed by a Biologist who questioned his ability to comment on a field which was not his specialty. Physics and Biology are inextricably linked in an observer based, SRT/ GR/ QM universe, and Physicists should study "Biology" while Biologists study Physics.

In the two sphere universe of Schwarzschild, we observe the universe from a remote, superposed location in the antiverse. (This is the only way a GR cosmology can make sense). For those unfamiliar with General Relativity in a Schwarzschild geometry, what I just said has implications which are extremely counterintuitive.

Briefly, in a two sphere Schwarzschild geometry, our matter and antimatter bodies are inversely mapped, superposed in energy and space, and separated over cosmological time by singularity...the cosmic abyss. Per the specifications of Special Relativity, however, we OBSERVE the universe via electromagnetic energy which is cosmologically a good part of the universal mass, and more important; everywhere simultaneously.

This reality of observation means that I can "observe" literally across the breadth of cosmological time instantly (time ceases to pass at the "speed of light")- from the antimatter body of the photonic antimatter "hemisphere" to the matter body of the collapsing matter "hemisphere". Only by observing the collapse of the matter "hemisphere" remotely from my superposed inversely mapped antimatter body is General Relativity congruent with reality in an observer based universe!

As I look at my matter body from near yet afar, I observe a rapid collapse in "proper time" as occurring very slowly- cosmological time dilation. When I do so, I can read the information stored on 4D event horizon surfaces, which seems as I investigate (and is) particulate to me.

How much stability REALLY lies in atomic particles and structure, anyway? Even now, scientists are beginning to realize that the characteristics of electrons, for example, demand that all electrons cosmologically exist as one big "Electron in the sky"! How long does it take for positively and negatively charged particles separated by 10 to the minus 25th CM to unite? The ONLY answer to the seeming stability of our 4D particulate universe is time dilation...a result, in General Relativity of remotely observing the proper time collapse of material reality into the cosmic abyss. By observing the universe as I have just described, from the "other side", we learn to control the matter side of the universe from the antimatter side.

As is always the case, there is a dramatic four dimensional projection of this fact...one side of the universe being observed and controlled by the other. The projection is the wiring of the nervous system in our own bodies! The right hemisphere of our brain controls the left side of our body and the left hemisphere of the brain controls the right side of our body.

I had a fine scientist criticize my use of 4D projections, calling them "analogous presentations". There are far too many such "analogies". These "analogous presentations" are, in fact, projections of a higher, seven dimensional, unfolding geometry...and are dramatic in the way they reflect the construction of the universe. For the common (and uncommon) person, such projections help us to understand the hidden part of our reality...that which we know to exist because of numerous scientific studies in every discipline from mathematics to astronomy...but cannot see because of space which is observationally absolutely flat, yet in reality is spherical and marginally closed with an Omega of 1.03.

Oh brother! Are we in science going to learn a thing or two about the nature of the universe in the next few months! The first surprise will be in the results of the recent propagation of gravity experiments involving quasars and Jovian gravity. These results are due out in mid-November, 2002.

UPDATE February 15, 2003: While the apulse, or the way gravity influences events in our 4D reality has been measured at the speed of light, the recent results leave the basic questions unanswered. The following is quoted from Ned Wrights Cosmology Tutorial at UCLA:

Speed of Gravity

7 Jan 2003 - "Kopeikin and Fomalont claim to have measured the speed of gravity by observing the deflection of radio waves from a quasar by the gravity of Jupiter. They found that the speed of gravity was equal to the speed of light, as predicted by general relativity. Cliff Will disputes this claim, stating that the deflection does not depend on the speed of gravity. But nobody disputes the fact that Kopeikin and Fomalont's data agree with general relativity. The only dispute is over what a theory with the speed of gravity different than the speed of light would predict."

The second revelation will be in the confirmation of extra large dimensions in the geometry of the universe, by the MAP project in January 2003.AUTHORS NOTE; February 17, 2003...This was a disappointment! Although the possibility of higher dimensionality in the universe was mentioned in the NASA press conference on February 11, no conclusions were drawn, and all WMAP results were interpereted within the confines of the 4D standard model. It is obvious we will have to wait for further...shall we say completely overpowering evidence before higher dimensionality will take its place beside its first cousin, singularity as a proven fact of cosmology!

Best Wishes,

Sam Cox