Hi: In the model, the universe is
eternal. I could list a half a dozen engineering reasons why I believe
it can only exist as an eternal entity. The problems are mathematical
irrationality in the system, and coordinate shift- and the key is, how
much coordinate shift in each cycle? Mathematicians reading this might
be interested to know that the MAXIMUM coordinate shift per cycle is the
Planck length...10 to the minus 33rd Cm. per cycle as observed from our
frame, but since cosmic singularity acts more like a phase solid, causing
"bounce", coordinate shift might be far less per cycle...and be related
not to actual linear shift but rather rotation in the footing at the foundation
of our reality. GR is based on a totally invariant
frame of reference system, but it is generally accepted by scientists that
GR cannot be used in the Planck realm...the region the author is speaking
about...see: "For scientists concerned about the horizon problem" on the
home page of this site. Mathematically, the totally invariant frame of
reference system based on geometric points in GR comes out at the back
end as a need for a "cosmological constant". The real multidimensional,
spherical GR universe model demands that "invariant" frame of reference
coordinates not be perfectly invariant. From an observational standpoint,
if the universe was not in a state of constant change, eternal or not,
time could not be said to exist! To state it another way, motion and
change (time) as we observe them, however illusory they are, MUST be
a projection of a cosmic time which is greater than instantaneous.
Mathematical irrationality, inherent in
spherical models, confirms the necessity for time! What a universe!...
this is
definitely NOT the place to look for perfection, rather struggle against
chaos. It doesn't take much to change the universe in a big way either!
Continental drift, resulting from the very slow shift in the guts (bedrock) of
the earth is the 4D projection, and I think it is appropriate. We can
assume that by slow coordinate change we mean ultra-slow, just as
cosmic time is ultra-brief! This assumption
is not groundless...we live in a pretty massive universe compared to the
earth. Philadelphia or London on the Earths surface may shift by 2
centimeters per year, but we on the 4D surfaces of a universe with a
mass of between 10 to the 53rd and 10 to the 60th KG would experience
almost imperceptible change as we "ride the wave front". Its a good thing.
When I was 17, at night I crossed the street. I waited for a car to pass
and stepped forward. A slight difference in air pressure caused me to
freeze- and an unlighted trailer behind the car missed my nose by
two inches. We landed short in the plane once; 6 inches higher, and
it would have been a normal landing. 6 inches lower and the dirt ridge
would have flipped the plane. We would have been toast. There are
places in all of our lives where the margin of error between life and
death has been measured in inches or millimeters....even less.
Because of the math, I can just plain assert that the universe is
NOT riding the edge perfectly. It is either moving toward disorder
or order. In this model, ( and I believe it is on the right track,
at least, for we ARE here...excuse the Anthropic Principle) life and
its complexity drives the
universe toward order. Our lives are lengthening and changing.
There was perhaps a time in the past, 1,000,000 cycles ago, when my life
ended in front of that trailer. 500,000 cycles ago, my life ended
in an airplane accident. There was a time, 100,000,000 cycles ago,
when Sam Cox as I know him, did not exist. 100,000,000 cycles in the
future, Sam Cox will become something that I could not recognize from
my present frame. The 4D projection of 7D, of course is ontogeny vs
phylogeny. The mathematically curious will be interested to know
that the above cycle numbers are very low, and are given only for the sake
of illustration. Actual coordinate shift would be much slower...
and if cosmic singularity DOES act as a phase solid, the universe could
be absolutely static- even with a Planck Realm. Imagine living in a
house with a concrete footing which weighs 10 to the 60th Kg!
Those readers interested in topology might have noted my reference
to cosmic singularity as a "phase solid". It is becoming clear that singularity
has at least two phase properties...solid/ amorphous and liquid /spinning.
It has been proposed that particles, atoms and ourselves
are topological defects created
during singular phase transition.The layman would perhaps understand me
better if I say that cosmic singularity spins and particulates in the momentum
of GR free
fall, much as water spins and particulates as it goes over a waterfall. Topologically
the "universe" is a bifid, almost infinite number of everywhere singular vortices
or whirlpools, but this analogy has SEVERE
dimensional limitations! The universe everywhere around us, the cosmos
as WE observe it within a few orders of magnitude at our frame,
is coming out of the big bang, going down the microsingular drain and
re-emerging on the other side of time. Every particle is perfectly and
inversely mapped to its opposite in the other "hemisphere", where the
process continues eternally. The vortex
surfaces of this everywhere process (topological defects- solitons)
are observed as particles, atoms and matter and make up our earth, and ourselves. Time dilation makes sensible observation
of the process possible, for in proper time, this cosmic collapse occurs in a fraction
of an Earth second.
At the bottom line, I don't believe the universe is absolutely static, and I don't believe reference
frames are geometric points either. I have more than mathematical irrationality,
the speed of light and the illusion of motion at our frame to show in
evidence too. I as a person, and an essential observer take a single
frame of reference, even though the amount of organized energy in my body
is incredible. Most observing frames in the universe share that
characteristic.
Observing frames of reference are based on photons and most are
large in scale. Anyone knows that it is more difficult to hit a small target
than a large one when we go to the rifle range. I believe the size of most
observing frames in and of itself betrays some instability and shift of
coordinates in the universe, and is natures way of solving a number of
engineering problems relating to the cosmological parameters.
There is a wide range of stability in scale- the proton
is stable...but complex structures at a higher level of scale must be even more
durable over cosmological time. Relative safety in size doesn't just
apply to Elephants! A proton which becomes an antiproton and
then a proton again at cosmic singularity is a ho-hum event.Protons
are carbon copies of each other and as a set share common characteristics.
The same thing is true of most sub-atomic particles. At this level of
scale, very close to the submicroscopic antipode, particles actually
can act like light itself, showing both particle and
wavelike characteristics.
A number of orders of magnitude higher along the space/ time dilation dimension, particles
organize into atoms. What kind of atoms are formed is determined by the case history
of each invariant reference frame. At this level, holographic differentiation, on
4D surfaces at 360 degrees is
well underway. Farther from the antipode, at our level of scale/ time dilation, the
time process and complexity of the particular hemisphere we are observing comes fully into
focus. Time passage as we observe it is an illusion, a projection of
the fundamental momentum of Space, Time and Energy. Because of the inverse mapping
of every atom and object on the two/ sphere,
the white hole, decreasing entropy hemisphere is observed from a
cosmologically remote location in generally increasing entropy, and the inverse.
Creating and conserving complexity sufficient to cognate, relate and
observe the universe requires building on a nice stable sub-atomic foundation
with even
more redundant systems...of which scale is one. Sphere flaking spinning
singularity in free fall creates the vast information storing surface
necessary to store the information but does NOT create permanence.
The sub-atomic universe is cosmologically unstable along the time
axis. This means that in proper time, each hemisphere of the universe
undergoes a sequential, programmed collapse in no more than a fraction
of an Earth second. The impression of time...or should I say, cosmological time
is created by time dilation as this collapse is observed by complex, inversely mapped
observers at a cosmologically
remote location on the other side of singularity.
Perhaps the biggest problem of an unbounded, closed universe
of finite mass as depicted in General Relativity is the inability
of the human mind to conceive a completely closed system!
The fact that the Planck Realm lies side by side with the GR universe, and we
can prove it exists, is perhaps a hint that this inability to conceive
a completely closed universe
may be related to the actual non-existence of such a cosmos! To me
the engineering problems of a closed GR universe, linked to the Planck
Realm by the quality we call "mass" and measurable event horizons are solvable. Under the assumption
of a quasi-static, geometric universe where some motion, if only momentum
exists, I have
aggressively advanced higher dimensionality and the complexity of life
as logical cosmological solutions on this web site.
Thanks for sharing those excellent ideas with me!...and
I have a class in 5 minutes! Best Wishes, Sam Cox |