The way the cosmos is observed (note "observed"...complexity sufficient to cognate!) from each invariant frame represents ultimate reality in a General Relativity Universe.

From a cosmic (non-observing, inside with the pistons and pan oil) frame a person approaching a black hole would disintegrate, say in .31 seconds. However, we must be careful in our use of "remote" and "proper" time. In a cosmos with a dual, Schwarzschild geometry, these concepts are oversimplified, and can even be misleading as we will see shortly.

In a typical very much simplified two frame mathematical exercise using GR formulae the "proper time" of a local observer entering a hole seems to be short....a fraction of a second to oblivion for example. From a remote frame, our person descending into the hole seems to "freeze"...we would have to wait for cosmological time to pass, to see him enter the hole. However, this simplified illustration of relativistic principle falls far short of the elegant complexity of GR in a dual geometry.

Conceptually, because of dualism, cosmological time separation, inversion on the two-sphere and the fact that all information is located in one region- the event horizon- the dual Einsteinian Hyperspherical Universe demands that all observing frames be "remote". For these reasons, even as we descend into the cosmic abyss, we do not observe what happens in "proper" time. We observe what happens from a remote, time dilated frame.

At the bottom line, the dual GR universe is not observed from just any frame, rather from a specific set of frames near the event horizon meeting the conditions I have just mentioned. The general set of frames from which the universe is observed is... "ecosystems". Subsets include the "animal" kingdom and the "plant" kingdom. Further dividing we have Phyla, Classes, Orders, Families and species of living things, yet even at the grass roots of this large group of sets, every individual is just that- an eternally existing invariant item with a unique frame of reference.

A final point; Just because certain event horizon surfaces are non-observing, is not to assert information cannot be stored there. Our blood does not observe, at least in the same way we do, but who would suggest that there is no important information stored in our blood cells? The event horizon surface of the Sun is the same as that in our own bodies in this respect. Geometers remind us constantly of how small a seemingly vast spherical universe can be. Cosmologically, mathematically and from the standpoint of information storage, the surfaces of the Suns singularity are at lifes' fingertips. To speak metaphysically, God is there, or, if you wish, "life monkeys around". The reader can pick between these options depending on their particular philosophical bias, but the author is inclined to see both points of view as two sides of the same coin.

The Earth is primarily observed from its surfaces, and the universe is the same way. A space person can move away from the surface of the Earth and observe our planet from a "distance" but the conditions of the home frame must be preserved...ie a space suit must be worn! If this reality of the GR universe seems obvious, remember it when you see examples of general relativity principle using hypothetical "observers"!

Why is an "observer" approaching a black hole of stellar or galactic mass without protection hypothetical? Taking a typical situation in proper time, the destruction of the observer would occur in, say .31 seconds, assuming he or she was not killed first by x-rays or unbalanced forces. Human reaction time is .75 seconds...it takes that long to perceive danger. Reaction takes far longer. It doesn't require a fertile imagination to realize that such an observer is "hypothetical". What we learn about relativistic principle from the exercise is worthwhile, as long as we understand the universe is not really observed from such a frame!

In the real, dual, two/sphere general relativity cosmos, observers plunging into the abyss in "proper time", are protected by cosmological time separation. They take a remote frame, and observe the universe in time dilation. (This has profound implications which I will address later.) A singular mass of universal proportions distributes and balances forces. This happens because as the energy of the universe condenses and concentrates on approach to the cosmic singularity, it is in balanced free fall. Like water going over a waterfall in analogous free fall, the matrix of singularity, and nearby approaching non-singular free energy particulates into "droplets" (Sphere Flakes of almost infinite total event horizon surface area) we call atomic particles, and atoms. The manner in which this process of particulation occurs, and whether more massive atoms are formed, as in stars, or the atoms appear (because they are observed in time dilation) to be stable, in "bodies" of planet size and mass creates our particulate world...our universe with its almost infinite, information storing event horizon potential as compared to that of the event horizon of a single, spherical, event horizon bounded singularity.

Much work has been done in attempts to explain the stability of atomic structure, and fundamental particles themselves, the proton for example. So many factors work to destabilize atomic and sub-atomic organization, it is hard to understand how say, the proton or even most atoms could have stable existence for the life of the universe, at least 10 to the 18th seconds.

This model implies that the sub-microscopic world is as unstable as it seems on first glance! An orderly, sequential, even programmed collapse of reality occurs on a cosmic scale in perhaps less than one Earth second. Viewed from our time dilated frame, all this action takes no less than cosmological time! We are not only observers, we are spectators and participants, working from a distance, with our hands inside the universe attempting to preserve our frame as long as possible. The astute scientist will remember that the sub-atomic world is many orders of magnitude closer to the eternal singular antipode than even we are...and grasp the implications.

AUTHORS NOTE: Matter (us and all information) is an event horizon phenomenon in this geometric model. In proper time the universe we know and understand pulsates in a small fraction of an Earth second. Being remote as observers and looking at the cosmos from a scaled distance, a geometric reality, brings the universe into existence, dilates time and gives stability and an impression of semi-permanence with gradual change. This holographic impression we call "reality" is analogous to a spectator viewing a film in a movie theater- from a seat, and from a distance- rather than with his or her nose pressed against a small portion of a giant screen!

AUTHORS NOTE #2: The fact that we, as observers. departing a universal white hole, (big bang) view the universe in generally increasing rather than decreasing entropy is an important verification of Schwarzschilds two/sphere model! For reasons rooted in the geometry of the system,(and engineering necessity!), all observers (who exist only at the event horizon and observe particulate energy discontinuities on 4D surfaces at 360 Degrees), take a remote frame and view the universe in time dilation."We" are on the outside of this "hemisphere", cosmologically separated in time, and so view an inverted entropy direction (increasing rather than decreasing, in spite of the fact we are departing a "big bang" or white hole.) Scientists who speak routinely of "The Big Bang" and in the next breath deny the existence of white holes as predicted in Schwarzschilds work, need to have a very close look at the conceptual framework upon which they base their view of reality.

Because of this time dilation then, a person living in an appropriate, life supporting environment, approaching a black hole of universal proportions notices nothing except fictitious forces, which in his lifetime seem to be the essence of stability...gravity. The entire universe around him or her slows to a crawl and completely changes its appearance. Tornadic dissolution becomes the periodic, particulate 4D reality we know so well. Cosmological time passes before his or her world deteriorates and passes away, in quite a programmed and orderly fashion.

Near the universal black hole, ALL of space/time is contracted, including the space/time in the observers body! This makes measured space/time seem vast (dilated) and scaled...even as he enters the black hole. The principle is as simple as noting that we are small, and the universe as we observe it is vast.

The universal black hole upon which matter is founded erases any bizarre disparities and gives an impression of "sameness" and "continuity" to the universe we observe in time dilation.The remote astronomical frame and a wristwatch frame are both at a proportionate distance because of this contraction of space and time, and our perception of time dilation applies to areas "near" as well as "far". Note however that the only reality we "see" is that which (within a few orders of magnitude) shares our frame (location) in scale: 10 to the minus 33rd Cm. above the cosmic pit.

Have you wondered where scale in the universe comes from? Why do we perceive things as large or small, macroscopic or microscopic? I said previously, and explained WHY the Earth IS an "event horizon" phenomenon. Topologically, the way we observe time dilation is spatial, we observe time dilation as "distance", and "scale". Time dilation itself is not readily observed...only its spatial effects and what we call motion and change- resulting from our inexorable creep toward the abyss.

It is also well at this point to remember once again that all frames of reference in the GR (dual) universe are invariant. Einstein INTENDED GR to be cosmologically static for engineering reasons and with a cosmological constant, even in 4D, the model IS essentially static (NOT dynamic as the arithmetic implies). Matter is dual,(demanding cosmological time separation), space is closed, and frames are based on photons. Ultimately, all energy based frames in this almost infinitely complex model have to be evaluated individually. Exercises in GR involving motion and change are really the basis for establishing an eternal set of momentum conditions which represent the unique existence (information) of that frame on the hypersphere.

Let me stress then, since matter is founded on singularity, the stability- the EXISTENCE- of the universe depends on duality, inverse mapping in space and energy, the cosmological time separation of matter and antimatter in the system- and time dilation.

"Proper (or cosmic) time" while a critical parameter, is not an observing frame. The person going into a black hole of universal mass is observing the outside universe from a cosmologically separated, "remote frame", and what he observes is as real as a time dilated muon boring through his or her body! For him or her, the whole outside universe- almost- freezes! He can't see the black hole, only himself and his surroundings.

The major conceptual checks for this concept are as follows (and are stressed on this site): First there is the matter of the Planck realm, the region of the submicroscopic everywhere, below 10 to the minus 33rd Cm. where matter begins by definition to take singular characteristics. Cosmologically, this every where/nowhere singular body of near cosmic mass has an event horizon radius of perhaps a matter of miles, but from our frame, it is observed as thinly spread "dark energy".

Second, we must not forget the conceptual principle that matter cannot form without the organizing influence of singularity...what we observe as the submicroscopic antipode, from our frame. The fact that matter forms in a fixed universal proportion from energy is an important clue to this universal truth. Free energy is just that (from our frame)...FREE. The "matter" atoms, molecules and particles we observe are energy discontinuities on 4D surfaces seen at 360 degrees, which disappear at universal singularity.

When we observe 4D surfaces from a higher Dimensional perspective we lose the ability to distinguish between basic properties of reality, and "see" them differently.

I have been asked; "How can cosmological time separation occur in the two/sphere?" To many the concept almost seems fanciful, but cosmological time separation and time dilation at ones local frame are mathematically and geometrically related.

In the model, as the event horizon is approached and local time dilation increases, the cosmos becomes "different". At first the difference between local and remote time is slight, but closer to the "Black hole", what "happens" at the local frame begins to vastly diverge from what occurs in cosmic reality...an observer experiences "cosmological time separation".

In the most extreme situation, just above the event horizon of a black hole of universal mass, the persons space/time (the distance he or she can astronomically "see") is separated to the other side of the universe... the light radius of our finite but unbounded universe away, and the full extent of cosmological time.The concept is as basic as saying this person can point a telescope outward and see back to the "Big Bang"!

As I have said then, in the two/sphere, with duality, the observers perception of time/distance as near vs far stretches from his or her currently observed frame, around the circumference of space time- and matches the persons other inversely mapped antimatter self, safely separated a cosmological distance in time away, yet superimposed on the other matter self in energy and space. This cosmological time separation (actually a function of time dilation) protects our matter/ antimatter two-selves from almost instant destruction and gives us our unique perspective on the cosmic reality.

Science has only known about the presence of "dark energy" (microscopic singularity) for a few years. This "microscopic singularity" is a universal black hole separated from us by what (as we have seen) we observe as a linear dimension...scale. It has been noted (because of acceleration outward) that the hemisphere of the universe we currently observe is constrained to have more "dark energy" now, than it could have possibly had in the past.

In the two/sphere model, the reason for the present "excess" and the continuing increase in dark energy necessary to sustain acceleration is that the two "hemispheres" of the two/sphere are like an hourglass. As soon as the "big bang" occurs, our hemisphere of the universe begins to devour itself, via black hole events. The singular quantum energy matrix finds its way into the basement of our reality, causing the fictitious force we call gravity. Gradually our side of the hourglass "fills up" with dark energy, like the Titanic filling with water and rotating to a 90 degree position. In the universe, when a "hemisphere" begins to "top off" with singularity, baryonic matter quite suddenly becomes an impossibility in a given hemisphere, polarity and "entropy" flip, what was a black hole becomes a white hole, and the universe "reconstructs" in the still existing other "hemisphere".

Baryonic matter becomes impossible in a "hemisphere" being "drowned" in singularity, because baryonic matter and the particles and atoms we observe are only event horizon phenomena anyway. At the singular event, 4D surfaces no longer exist, and neither does our reality.

Of course, nothing really "moves", in a static model like the one described on this site. The "re-surfacing" of the cosmological constant issue is handwriting on the wall, indicating the very real possibility that Einsteins original intention in creating SRT/GR as a geometric static model may yet be the best representation of cosmic reality. All this description of motion is from a non-cosmic infra-dimensional frame.

Frames of reference in the universe are invariant. The momentum of General Relativity changes conditions, but I stay at the same place in space and time forever with only imperceptible change. So do you. So does the Sun and the Earth...everything. How can anything get lost when nothing goes anywhere? The GR. model is static, right down to the cosmological constant, and a static universe means eternal existence for everything and everybody. As Einstein said: "Time is an illusion".

Why am I so confident of the validity of this concept? First, it is experimentally verifiable, and very powerful, even in 4D. In 7D it becomes an engineering masterpiece, explaining where "energy", entropy and time "process" and direction come from and how complexity is preserved in the cosmos. The logic of the mathematical functions is precise. Everywhere the theoretician looks, there is an answer. If there is an answer to the "why" question in such a universe, it has to lie in the will to live and a collective refusal to die, but philosophy aside, this General Relativity/ quantum model has a place for almost everything...and everything is most definitely in its place.