 |
 |
 |
Unbounded / Hyperspherical
The GR, Einsteinian
Universe is unbounded and hyperspherical, foundationally in
7-dimensions.
Beyond the geometry of a crepe, for us
Earthlings, our own planet is the beginning of our understanding
of Einstein's universe. Our planet when we casually examine it seems to be a 4 dimensional hypersphere.
It's surface is unbounded in the sense that we can wander all
over the world without falling off. Also, we can observe
that there are places on the earth which are inhospitable to
life, there are places where the spring, summer, fall and winter
of life advance north and south over its unbounded surface on a
periodic basis, and there are, of course, the tropical regions
where, except in certain mountainous areas, life thrives
continuously. Conditions in the EHU are analogous in some ways-
different in others.
The 7 Dimensional Einsteinian Hyperspherical universe
is based on the Schwarzschild two/sphere concept. A two/sphere consists of not
one, but TWO sphere sets, (two three spaces), linked by a single, single
process time dimension, superimposed in energy and space, but cosmologically
separated in time. Actually each invariant frame of reference in the GR
universe is the foundation of this almost infinite series of two spheres- from
10 to the minus 33rd Centimeters to perhaps 10 to the 40th Centimeters-
the radius of the universe. THERE IS NOTHING OUTSIDE; being spherical,
the surfaces of this model are unbounded.
The two spheres ("hemispheres") are separated by a wall of submicroscopic
singularity in the Planck realm, at 10 to the minus 33rd
Centimeters-everywhere. In that singular region, space/time as we
know it ceases. If we go beyond, we enter ("bounce" out into) another reality...the Earth
of 60 Billion years in the future...an Earth where our future is the
past...a complete world where everything works out OK.
From our present frame
of reference, this other, second Earth would seem to be
thermodynamically reversed- but because of the periodic nature
of time flow, there is no inverse process. The universe is simply
returning, via its natural momentum to singularity.
Throwing a baseball up in the air- and
watching it come down again is a pretty good analogy. What goes up as they say (with NOT
complete accuracy!) must come down. In the universe, what goes around,
comes around...what is sown is reaped. However, for reasons related
to the fact that the universe is not infinite in mass, there is coordinate shift- and
change in the free fall momentum of General Relativity- even in 7-D!
The second law of thermodynamics, tends to gradually bring the
universe to destruction, while the complexity of life overcomes
this tendency.
Viewed from over the north pole, the
earth rotates counterclockwise, and the phenomenon is so
"real" that storms in earth's atmosphere are configured
counterclockwise. Viewed from over the south pole, the earth
rotates clockwise, and storms in the vernal hemisphere take on
the clockwise rotation pattern. Is the Einsteinian Hyperspherical
Universe rotating? The earth does, why not the hyperspherical
universe? Recent observations indicate fairly strongly (29 out of
30) that the universe is not rotating and considering the theoretical
importance of the existence of non-spin, amorphous singularity in
the universe, this finding is VERY good news! From a cosmic frame
in a GR universe, there is nothing for the universe to spin with
respect to- all spin comologically cancels, but in a dual universe,
parts of each "hemisphere" rotate differently with respect to frames in the
other "hemisphere". Rotation is found in some
"black Holes" and not, presumably in others. Rotation
is a common and essential phenomenon- inside the universe.
The matter of rotation (spin) is likewise important at the submicroscopic
antipodes of the universe. As I just said, amorphous, or everywhere existing,
submicroscopic singularity has a "non-spin" characteristic which is
theoretically important, for it permits "bounce". Items up to and
including a whole universe can go "in" past both horizons and come
back "out" unscathed, except for reversed polarity and cosmological time
separation. This theoretical characteristic of amorphous, non-spin
singularity relates to the inverse mapping of matter and antimatter
in the system, and predicted Einsteinian
photon characteristics. It also explains how a whole universe can go in
and come out of a singularity- and stay organized! In contrast, spinning singularity relates
to the creation of the world of particles we perceive in 4-D.
Spinning singularity loses its bounce. Bounce/non-bounce is the
theoretical foundation for the very real difference between the
world we know and cosmic reality...in fact it is "differences" which
make a universe possible! Everything we know and understand starts
with spin/non-spin. Universal finitude makes momentum in GR and singular
spin possible. Spinning bits of discontinuous singularity in balanced
free fall attract free
energy and form particles and atoms of matter. These energy discontinuities
in turn, on 4D event horizon surfaces create our reality. Interesting mathematical details relating to this concept
are posted on the Internet at: http://home.beseen.com/technology/
zephcochrane/paper.htm
Whether life exists and when life exists
and thrives on the earth, as we saw in our introduction, is as
much a matter of location, position and coordinates as time.
Storms approach one way in the northern hemisphere and another
way in the southern hemisphere, however the way they approach
seems natural to people used to living in the different
hemispheres. Conditions are analogous in the 7-D universe...
we see time "approach" and "recede" in different ways, for example.
A very important fact about the earth
when we are considering the Seven Dimensional Hyperspherical
Universe is that the EHU has a total of four poles- not two. There
is not one big bang, but TWO, for
the Einsteinian universe like the earth has not one, but two
"hemispheres", actually two 3 spaces superimposed
on each other and linked by a time dimension. Moreover,
each "hemisphere" has, at 180
Degrees along its axis, a "time-like", bean shaped
singularity (entropy related) at its opposite pole.
The General Relativity universe
did not begin at a single geometric point. It started everywhere!
How can a "Big Bang" begin
everywhere yet at one point? If we think this counterintuitive-
it isn't really that hard to conceive. Looking up in the sky, 180
Degrees, but imagining 360 degrees EVERYWHERE as we look outward,
we look back in time toward the "Big Bang".
It is that simple. The "Big
Bang" began everywhere...yet nowhere. In 7-D this is even
easier to understand, for the new hemisphere is born in the heart
of every frame of reference of its symmetrical "hemispheric
counterpart. Thinking this way it is
easier to conceptualize a static, geometric universe with varying
conditions at each frame of reference.Still, obviously at this point, we begin to depart
from our faithful 3 dimensional analogy. It strikingly and
faithfully reflects aspects of the hyperspherical universe, but
now we must take a leap beyond.
When we look outward, at the stars, in
ANY direction, we look over the curvature of space/time toward
what we can call the "north pole of the universe", the
Big Bang. However, we are not just looking north, in the
hyperspherical universe, we are looking in EVERY direction
outward! This is the essence of the jump in dimensions we are
making. If we follow space time far enough in ANY direction, we
return to the present; perhaps via a big bang, or a singularity,
but we return! If this seems outrageous, perhaps we should remember
what I previously said about "bounce" in singularity!
It would be well to note that we not
only can look OUTWARD, but INWARD, toward the microscopic, and
proceed eventually, via microscopic singularity, "out"(actually we pivot and bounce);
into the vastness of the universe in the opposite direction,
continue our journey over cosmological eras of time and back to
this frame of reference. We return to ourselves!... because a
General Relativity universe consists of three elements, energy,
space and time in an eternal PERIODIC momentum.The microscopic
universe, like the macroscopic universe is vast- and linked with
our macroscopic reality- everywhere.
I should mention, once again, that by
symmetry, we, as observers, do not observe space to be curved in
a GR universe! To the contrary, we feel we are "in the
center" of everything, and we look out along the axis on seemingly
linear, flat or Euclidean space. To see the curvature of space,
we would have to view the universe from a seven dimensional
perspective! At 4-D, space in GR is observed positively FLAT and
the movements of heavenly bodies are periodic! In 7-D, space, time
and energy can be seen to be periodic in their momentum- but every
object in the universe takes on a unique geometric shape- and freezes!
If we travel "outward" in 4-D space, we actually are on the
curved surface of the two/sphere, and, in a manner fully
consistent with the circular flow of energy, space and time in
General Relativity, we return to ourselves! The effect is like
"bumper cars" at a carnival. We go straight out, 12.5
Billion light years to the "Big Bang". At the speed of
light we "Bounce off", reverse polarity and come right
"straight" back to ourselves- but what a surprise! We
are reversed in the polarity of the matter of our bodies, and
find we grow younger rather than older.
Finally, I want to stress what I said previously. Despite
the observed flatness of space in the 4-D universe we observe, I believe
we can and will observationally detect the marginally
closed nature of space in our vast, but finite universe...if
looking outward toward every where/nowhere isn't evidence enough! 
Recent "Maxima" and "Boomerang" balloon experiments testing the Cosmic
background radiation have both shown a depressed second
peak of the power spectrum. By FAR the most plausible
explanation for this (and the most widely accepted) is that the universe contains at least 50% and
probably 100% more Baryonic ("normal" atoms) matter than we can observe. The combined antiversal mass of this "extra" matter
figures into the "missing mass" problem, and doubles
the force of gravity we observe in our half of the universe. This "other side" also puts
missing mass where it needs to be to
explain the rotational characteristics of the galaxies and explains observed
acceleration outward toward the Black Hole side of our Big Bang. Additional
missing mass (at "close" range in our galactic arm, as detected
by Jan Oort in the 1930's) plus up to 300 times the observed mass of the
universe necessary to give us the motions of the universe
in its most distant regions is, in this model
explained by; 1. Doubling the total mass of the Baryonic Matter in the
universe and 2. Accounting for most of the rest as Non-Baryonic
matter and "dark energy"- the mass of singularity at the astronomical and submicroscopic
antipodes of the universe. This massive singular matrix is the correct
basis for Einsteinian Gravity...perceived from our frame it IS space/time.
Perhaps "time travel" seems
impractical. It would take billions of years to make one
universal circumnavigation as a 21st century Columbus, right?
Wrong. We must remember the properties of light, and singularity.
From the frame of reference of light, the whole universe is just
there, in a neat little package, start to finish. The Photon universe does NOT communicate at the speed
of light.. it communicates INSTANTANEOUSLY.
The Photons coming from the lamp
in my living room are part of the same (big bang, white hole, CBR) matrix which exists on the far side
of the universe! To paraphrase the words of the song from Disney World: "It's a small universe after all!"
We, and other Material objects
communicate at the speed of light, yet in essence, we ourselves
consist of, and are affected by the properties of Electromagnetic energy. The fact
that we consist of photons, in fact strongly infers the veracity
of the geometric universe, for as photon forms we, like photons
themselves have an eternal, fixed frame of reference on the
hyperspheres of the 7-D Geometric Universe.
An early universe consisting of nothing but Photons had NO time as we
understand it. Do we wish to travel a billion light years? No
problem, we need only ride a beam of light, and we can view the
whole cosmic show in a jiffy! How can a human ride a beam of
light? I have just said, and we must not forget that humans are a participating part of the
Einsteinian Hyperspherical Universe. Our lives are EXPRESSED as
patterns of electromagnetic energy!
I've spoken about the "north
pole" of each "hemisphere" of the universe, and
the "Big Bang". However, where is the "south
pole" of each "hemisphere" of the universe? The
"south pole" is the submicroscopic singularity antipode which pervades space and is found at
the heart of every atom! This "dark energy" contains the "time like", bean shaped
singularity of the universe which eventually will rise into the
macroscopic world we inhabit and change the flow of order
(loosely entropy) in the universe. The amount of energy in this
singular froth of quantum fluctuations which marks the boundary
between the "Hemispheres" of the universe is huge, (two/ thirds
of the mass of the universe in total) and
it is difficult to tunnel through. This is a good thing, for
without such protection, we wouldn't have a universe to live in
anymore!
I really dislike talking about clogged
sewer pipes, but firmly believe that people who think they
observe "forces" in the heart of atoms are in for a
surprise; an Einsteinian surprise, a surprise of geometric
relationship with microscopic (from OUR frame of reference)
singularity. The "sewer pipe" dilemma was confronted by
PAM Dirac in his work. He had serious mathematical problems
preventing a one-sided (and four dimensional) universe from
"going down the tube". He did his work before topology
became a household word. Figuring he couldn't accept parallel
universes because they would annihilate each other, he
hypothesized a "foundation" of particles, perhaps
infinitely massive to support and stabilize reality.
In a 7-D Einsteinian Hyperspherical
Universe, the Universe is counterbalanced by its exact opposite
"hemisphere", the Antiverse. While the Universe and
Antiverse are superimposed, they are separated by microscopic
singularity and pass in opposite directions in time. They are, in
fact, despite their seeming closeness, because of the effect of
singularity, 180 degrees away from each other on the hypersphere,
so mutual annihilation is quite impossible. Our future
"self" is, in effect, 60 billion years in the
future...far enough to prevent the mutual destruction of
our matter/antimatter two
selves!
Indications are that we are not quite on
the equator of the finite, unbounded Einsteinian Hyperspherical
Universe. 12.5 billion years ago from our frame of reference, our
"hemisphere" of the Einsteinian Hyperspherical universe
was born. As I mentioned earlier in this abstract, larger
singularities as viewed from a frame of reference inside our
universe become progressively less and less stable as they accrue
matter and energy. As the last of the dying galaxies of the other
"hemisphere" of the universe finally combined with the
sum total of the matter/energy of that half of the universe, a
process of attenuation began which still continues today.
At the instant everything, everywhere in our
"hemisphere" of the universe became singular, it began attenuating (hot
Big Bang "explosion"). Simultaneously the other "hemisphere" reached its
maximum extent, and began to contract....but the overall location
of the universe was STILL EVERYWHERE. This is easy to understand
if we remember that all frames of reference eternally remain in
the same "place" in a 7-D, GR universe. Where is this
"contracting" space/time? It is billions of light years
away in space/time coordinates yet right here with us- on the
other side of the microscopic singularity which marks the
boundary of the two halves of the hyperspherical universe.
Before a "hemispheric"
singularity begins to attenuate into a "big bang" there
is a change of polarity, and a reversal, or flipping of the time
dimension from the previous incoming condition. This is the only
way matter can escape from a black hole so as to produce the
observed effects we note today with our instruments. The
attenuation could not have been a slow "evaporative
process". It was nothing less than a massive "explosion"-
impossible without time "reversal". The reader might
ask how I say "impossible". Those who doubt may check
the mathematics. NOTHING comes out of a black hole by definition-
without dualism and a two/sphere Schwarzschild geometry.
This abstract discusses a cosmological model
based on mathematical formulae!
Scientists who deny the existence of
time reversal, and defend the 4-D universe, understand the need
for a vast source of energy for their cosmology. They fall back
on Dirac's first hypothesis: that the universe lies on and is
supported by an infinitely vast floor of quantum fluctuations (he
thought particles).
Why infant universes are not being born
continuously from this vast source of energy, consuming the
universe in the conflagration, is an unanswered problem. Also,
this 4-D idea makes a shambles of the First Law of
Thermodynamics, which I don't think is "Holy", but
consider to be worth more than passing consideration! Finally,
the search for decreasing entropy in such a universe taxes the
imagination of the worlds greatest minds.
In 7-D, as I said, Matter and Energy are
completely conserved, and the quantum fluctuations are a finite,
if very energetic boundary between the twin
"hemispheres". This boundary protects the Universe and
Antiverse from each other, and prevents their mutual destruction,
by assuring cosmological time separation for the otherwise superimposed
halves
of reality.(See Hawking Form #2; post 38022) Order is always present in 7-D and, because of the
existence of life, a 7-D universe has continuously decreasing
entropy (increasing order)!
Energy in its various forms,
from compact singularity to photon, is the substance of the
universe and makes reality possible, by influencing our
perception of the existence, nonexistence, shape and direction of
space and time.
As seen from our frame, during the "big bang", one
hemisphere of the Einsteinian Hyperspherical universe
attenuates into stable microscopic singularity and free falling,
spinning singularity. Free energy attracted by this matrix forms
particles and atoms according to the formula E=mc squared. Discontinuities
form the 4D surfaces we view- in time dilation- as "reality". This energy
density system persists only briefly, but it collapses in a sequential
programmed fashion. Because of the vast mass of the system, time
dilation makes the universe seem semi-permanent as the
new hemisphere develops
according to the pattern preserved
in the other "hemisphere".
So far as life in either
"hemisphere" is concerned,
the "Big Bang" is a nonevent, being observed in the
astronomical far distance or deep down in
the microscopic scale of the universe. Nevertheless,
at the instant that "explosion" occurs, the fully expanded
universal hemisphere passes the bean-shaped, time-like
antipode (pole) and begins its journey from increasing toward
decreasing entropy. Singularity and event horizon phenomena
are the controlling forces which shape and bring identity to our cosmos
Inflation, as devised by Alan Guth is an interesting concept.
In his effort to create a workable model of early cosmic expansion,
just after the "big bang", Dr.Guth found it necessary to suspend
time...that is have a period during which the universe experienced
almost infinitely rapid expansion. To avoid contradicting General
Relativity, Dr. Guth was obliged to keep "inflation" within the
"Planck Era"...the event horizon of the singular region. This makes sense, for the
Planck era, in a static cosmology still exists, and it is an eternal
region where time cannot be said to pass. However, what we presently
identify as gravity also occupies this region and would presumably
be subject to the same conceptual restraints...or perhaps I should
say...conceptual possibilities? (See Hawking Forum #2; 37217)
Time doesn't pass
at the speed of light...so what happened when the universe was
only photons does NOT relate to time. From OUR frame of
reference, it is possible to conclude that extreme superluminal
velocities were attained in the early expansion of the infant
universe, however, our lack of understanding of the Photon limits
the value of these calculations.
A singularity of any kind is a
no-nonsense place so far as both mathematicians and engineers are
concerned. Early "nanosecond" models which attempt to
bring an entire universe and order from utter nothingness are, as
we will see in the next few paragraphs, "Ad Hoc, usually
related to attempts to make a 4-D universe "work", and
ignore the real source of order in an 7-D Einsteinian
Hyperspherical Universe: its dual nature and eternal existence.
There is no speed of light inside a
singularity, or for that matter from the frame of reference of
the Photon! Movement becomes what it really is...a condition. A
singularity the size of the "Big Bang" would have been
not only huge, but would have had a large event horizon. For a
significant time during its early attenuation, a newborn
"hemisphere" remains a singularity within which a
mathematical search for emerging order is conjectural.
Any mathematical model of the universe
when it consisted only of Photons is based on extrapolation. For
readers who are not familiar with the term
"extrapolation", it is a kind of "gang plank"
or diving board on which a mathematician extends the relatively
known to the unknown- and hopes for the best. Extrapolation is a
useful- even invaluable, tool in science, but the search for
complex order in a "soup" of Photons with no universal
dimensions is usually related to efforts to "force" the
four dimensional universe to work, and triggers wild conjecture
which puts the counterintuitive 7-D universe to shame.
Most Ad Hoc models work from assumed
temperature relationships and known mass- but ignore the fact
that neither temperature nor mass exist within a singularity (though
they may be perceived from an OUTSIDE frame of reference). The
original singularity was pervasive and awesome. As it attenuated,
it formed the foundation of our reality. Today, we, even from our
frame of reference, still live enmeshed in a cobweb matrix of
microscopic singularity billions of years after the "Big
Bang".
It has been inferred that because we
find singularity in every direction, and it can be defined as a
condition which exists everywhere and nowhere, that we actually
live IN a singularity. There is a big difference between
singularity in us and us in a singularity! While this is
interesting speculation, it is mathematically wrong; in the GR
model, no description of anything exists inside a singularity,
let alone an organized 7-D hyperspherical universe! Moreover
quick calculations of the engineering realities of actually being
inside a sizable "Black Hole" show why nothing we
understand could exist there. This subject is outside of the
mathematical parameters of the universe described in this
abstract. The diluting influence of "empty" space (microscopic
singularity at a distance in scale) must exist to permit reality as we know and can
mathematically describe it to exist.
Space is a condition which can
be said to exist when matter/energy in its various configurations
can be identified and related.
It is also beyond the scope of this
paper to describe how a singularity can be everywhere in us (not
us in it) in the universe, and yet nowhere at the same time,
however I guarantee I will not get a single letter from any
mathematician questioning what I say.
Attaining a working understanding of
the topological relationship between everywhere and nowhere,
Photon and Singularity, space, scale and direction, is a great
challenge for science in the 21st century.
The concept of the universe
being one, yet dual and fully expanded and contracted to a
singularity at the same "time" (static) is mathematically sound,
profoundly counterintuitive, Einsteinian- and an important part of the most
experimentally verified model of reality in history!
|